logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.11.02 2018고단372
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall borrow or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive any consideration in using or managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on April 2018, the Defendant received a text message stating that “I will give two million won per account to each alcoholic beverage company, if I lend an account from the alcoholic beverage company for the reduction of or exemption from taxes,” from the person who was in the name of the first police officer, and then in response thereto, the Defendant received the same month.

6. At around 13:00, Kwikset service article sent name-free winners on the street in front of the office of Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and sent a physical card connected to the Defendant’s name Saemaul Bank account (B). At that time, the number of account numbers and physical card numbers of the above new credit cooperative account were known to the name-free persons in the name of the deceased.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for, lent the access media for electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. The principal's financial transactions and receipts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to replies following a search and inspection warrant;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) was that the Defendant committed the instant crime on the ground that the Defendant had easily committed the instant crime, thereby causing the singishing victim.

However, the punishment shall be determined by taking into consideration the fact that the defendant has mistakenly recognized and has no previous record of the same kind.

arrow