(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.28 2015고단2242

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.28 2015고단2242

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for 2 years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 17, 2015, Defendant A, at the “G” head office located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on July 21:13, 2015, the Defendant was at the time when he talked with the victim B(39 years of age) and the construction site work. Defendant A, who was at the time, was at the time of having the victim’s head head knife with the 500cc beer mac beer residues, and was at the time of drinking the victim’s face knife with the victim’s head knife, and was at the time of having the victim’s face knife with the victim’s head knife.

2. Defendant B and C’s co-principal Defendants were the victim A(39 years of age) and Si expenses for the foregoing reasons at the date, time, and place set forth in the foregoing 1.3 years of age. Defendant B 500cc beleeped the victim’s head with the victim’s head knife knife with the victim’s head knife knife with the victim’s head knife, and Defendant C knifed two times of the victim’s head knife with the victim’s face knife by taking part in Defendant B’s act.

In common, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim in the treatment days in which their hair and eye are teared.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H, I, and J;

1. Statement of the police statement to K;

1. A standing photograph, B standing photograph (the above Defendants B, C, and the defense counsel asserted that the above Defendants were in a state of mental disorder by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime in this case. Thus, according to the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court, the above Defendants were aware of drinking alcohol at the time of the crime in this case, but it does not seem that the above Defendants did not have the weak ability to discern things or make decisions. Accordingly, the above Defendants and the defense counsel’s above assertion is not accepted). Thus, the above Defendants’ and the defense counsel’s aforementioned assertion is not accepted).

1. Article 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the facts constituting an offense.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률 제3조

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2018.06.07 2018고단1115

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.01 2017고단8734

-광주지방법원 2018.03.28 2017고단5754

-청주지방법원 2015.08.13 2014고단1940

-서울동부지방법원 2014.10.29 2014고단2920