logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가합69538
임대차보증금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 130,000,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from December 16, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 10, 201, the Plaintiff leased the instant officetel 701 mobile 701 (hereinafter “the instant officetel”) from the Defendant from the Defendant for the period from November 30, 201 to November 29, 201, with the lease deposit of KRW 120,00,000, and the lease deposit amount from November 30, 201 to November 29, 201. The Plaintiff paid the Defendant the said lease deposit to the Defendant around that time. On November 28, 2011, the Suwon District Court received 182907 deposit money for the instant officetel from the Suwon District Court, with the term of KRW 120,00,000, and from November 30, 201 to November 29, 2011, the term of the lease deposit was completed.

B. On September 25, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the Defendant for the lease deposit amounting to KRW 130,00,000, and the lease period from November 30, 2012 to November 29, 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) with respect to the instant officetel, and additionally pays KRW 10,000,000 for the increased lease deposit amount at that time. On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of change of lease deposit with the Suwon District Court’s registry office (167519) as to the registration of the establishment of the instant lease on a deposit basis, changing the lease deposit amount to KRW 130,00,000,000 and the return period to November 29, 2013.

C. Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not notify the Defendant of the refusal to renew the instant lease prior to the expiration of the lease term, and the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement on May 3, 2014, and removed the instant officetel from the instant officetel around June 30, 2014.

On December 4, 2014, the Plaintiff deposited one copy of the certificate of cancellation of lease on a deposit basis, certificate of personal seal impression, certificate of delegation of registration, certificate of right to registration and six card keys of the instant officetel as water No. 9 in Suwon District Court in December 2014, on the grounds of the Defendant’s refusal to accept the lease on a deposit basis, and the notice of deposit was served on the Defendant on December 15, 2014.

【Ground for recognition” has no dispute, and Nos. 1 through 5

arrow