A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

【2013 Highest 339】 The Defendant is a person who actually operated D Co., Ltd., a company manufacturing and distributing clothes.

On July 10, 2012, the Defendant called the Victim E (the 40-year-old-old-old-old-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

However, the F had no plan to invest additional funds in the state of investment in the Defendant's business, and the economic situation has deteriorated, such as failure to pay the price of supply to the company that requested the manufacture of the product, etc., so even if borrowing the money from the victim, the F did not have the ability to pay it as a promise.

The Defendant, as above, made the victim’s false statement, and caused the victim to acquire 60 million won through D’s account around the 11st of the same month.

[Judgment of the court below]

1. On December 2010, the Defendant forged private document at the H office operated by the Defendant in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating in the column of location the “Seoul Metropolitan Government I Apartment Complex No. 601,” the “Seoul Metropolitan Government I apartment 600,000,000” in the deposit column, the “Seoul Metropolitan Government J apartment 410-101, the “K” in the resident registration number column, and the “L” in the lessor’s name column, and affixed the seal of L name attached to the above L name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of L, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On December 2010, the Defendant issued a forged real estate lease contract as if it were a document that was duly formed.