1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The defendant's argument in the trial of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for additional determination as to the defendant's argument in the trial of the court of

[However, the part concerning the co-defendant C and D of the first instance court, which was separately and separately finalized, was used or added on February 2, 200, with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, “Defendant B” in the part concerning the reasoning of the first instance judgment, “Defendant B” as “Defendant”, “real estate 1” as “instant real estate,” and “Appraiser F” as “Defendant F of the first instance appraiser.”

In the third chapter of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “the Vice-Mayor” shall be added in front of “the authorization of establishment of a cooperative”.

No. 4 (e) of the judgment of the first instance court, “after the date of the closing of the instant case,” shall be construed as “after the date of the closing of the argument in the first instance court.”

The 6th to 7th of the decision of the first instance court shall be in accordance with the following subparagraphs.

[1) In the event that a housing reconstruction and improvement project association, upon the exercise of the right to demand sale, files a lawsuit seeking the implementation of procedures for the registration of transfer of ownership by exercising the right to demand sale against a person who does not consent to the establishment of the association, and a copy of the complaint is attached to a reply letter as to whether to participate in reconstruction, the association has given a peremptory notice as to the right to demand sale to the other party by serving a copy of the complaint attached with the peremptory notice, so long as the association has given a peremptory notice as to the right to demand sale on the other party, it can be deemed that the other party has the same effect as exercising the right to demand sale on the date following the expiration of the reply

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da63380, Jul. 15, 2010). According to the aforementioned basic facts, relevant statutes, and legal principles, the Plaintiff is subject to Article 39 and Article 39 of the former Act.