logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.11.13 2018가단514038
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 44,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 2, 2015 to November 13, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

At around 19:48 on May 2, 2015, D recognized the basis for the liability for damages, while driving the E-learning car (hereinafter referred to as “A-learning car”) at a speed of 58 km per hour from the e-mail to the e-mail of the Pacific-Si Highway located in the Gyeongan-Gun, Gwangju-do, Gwangju-do, the front side of the three-lane Don-don-si, Gwangju-do, the Donan-si, the Don-si, the Don-si, the Don-si, in which the speed of the vehicle is 30 km per hour, the driver was reduced within the speed of the vehicle within the speed of 30 km, and the driver was required to safely examine the front side by safe examination, thereby causing the Plaintiff’s injury to the right side of the e-mail, the Plaintiff’s injury to the e-mail and the upper part of the e-mail and the upper part of the Plaintiff’s injury to the right side.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with D with respect to a sea-going vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] According to the above facts and the overall purport of the pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 5, 9, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case as the insurer of a sea-going vehicle.

In full view of the purport of the argument by the above evidence, the Plaintiff committed an error of crossing the lane on the ground without permission, even though it is necessary to use a Tol, instead of a lane, in the event that the Plaintiff moves to handle the vehicles violating the Habs, and the aforementioned error was caused by the occurrence and expansion of damages, the scope of the Defendant’s liability is limited in consideration of the above error, but all the circumstances shown in the argument by the instant case are taken into account.

arrow