The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable. However, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the following: (a) the Defendant appealed on the ground that the Defendant committed larceny at night by shouldering the glass window or destroying the building and impairing the structure; (b) the nature of the crime is extremely bad, dangerous, and the Defendant did not agree with the victims; (c) the Defendant did not recover from damage; and (d) there were many kinds of criminal records and arguments, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the term “01:0-00-00” in Section 2 of the judgment of the court below is “01:00-00”, “00-02:00” in Section 21 of the judgment of the court below, “0:10-00” in Section 21 of the judgment of the court below is “00:10-00”, “0-2:00”, “private report” in Section 3-11 of the judgment of the court below is corrected as “a investigative report”, and “CCTV video CDs and caps photographs” in Section 3-1 of the judgment of the court below is deleted, and each correction is made.