logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고단2547
특수폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 17:55, at the main point of “C” located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul on March 20, 2019, the Defendant saw the victim “C” that the victim D (n'e, 41 years of age) did not sell alcohol to oneself; (b) caused the victim’s “hacker, n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n't n'; (c) said the victim would have known the Defendant’s father of his disturbance to n't n't n't n't kn't n't n't n't n't n't n't n', followed the victim’s kitchen kn's residence (16.5cm length, total length).

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with D 1, investigation report (STV video recording confirmation), CCTV image CDs at the scene of crime;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act which choose a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, where the defendant committed an assault against the victim who is vulnerable to the crime, and the nature of the crime is not good, due to the crime of this case, the victim was faced with severe mental impulse and should have waived his occupation, but the defendant did not receive a letter of suspicion from the victim.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is the first offender is favorable.

In each of the above circumstances, the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, occupation and environment, and the background of the crime in this case.

arrow