1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From August 21, 2014, each of the above.

1. On August 3, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) on the Plaintiff’s site condition at the Defendant’s request, with a deposit amount of KRW 20 million, from August 20, 2012 to August 20, 2013, with a monthly rent of KRW 200,000,000, and with a lessee’s rent of KRW 200,000,000, with a lessee’s rent of KRW 30,000,000,000, the lessor agreed to immediately terminate the lease agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease”). The Defendant paid the lease deposit to the Plaintiff, delivered the instant land, and operated a wholesale sales business among the main households on the land, and the Defendant did not pay the postal rent from August 21, 2014 to the Defendant on each of the following grounds; and the Defendant did not provide evidence as follows: (3).

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case is explicitly renewed after the expiration of the lease term stipulated in the above contract, and it is deemed that the contract of this case was legally terminated around January 29, 2015 due to the defendant's default. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver the land of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay or return the overdue rent of this case or unjust enrichment equivalent to the overdue rent of 200,000 won from August 21, 2014 to the date the above delivery is completed.

The plaintiff's assertion is justified.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. On October 2014, the Defendant asserted that the payment of the instant land was delayed, and then called to the Plaintiff to pay the monthly rent to the third party.