logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2020.11.12 2018가단52141
손해배상(의)
Text

The defendant's KRW 26,62,916 to the plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 1, 2017 to November 12, 2020 to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On March 19, 2017, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital after completing an accident that was caused by the stairs from the Plaintiff’s first hospitalization. (2) On the left side, the Plaintiff diagnosed that the Plaintiff was caused by the crypt of the crypt of the left crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the crypt of the Plaintiff’s left side.

3) On March 30, 2017, after the instant surgery, the Plaintiff came to high heat from around March 30, 2017. On April 4, 2017, the Plaintiff was released from the Defendant Hospital on April 12, 2017, after being treated in urine with urine as a result of the detection of dynaculosis, and received treatment from the urcology. (4) Meanwhile, at the time of hospitalization of the Plaintiff, the CRP (C-react PP), is a substance that increases or decreases in quantity in response to dynaculosis, i.e., infection, self-deficiency disease, etc. or organizational damage (in the outside, operation, heart color, heart color, and fynacul).

Through the changes in the quantity of the CRP, it may be referred to in the diagnosis of various kinds of chropsic reactions, such as infectious diseases or self-deficiency diseases.

Although the normal water of CRP is not uniform at home and abroad, in general, it is expected that there is a salt increase if it increases above 0.5-10 g/L (5-10 g/L).

Although 0.09 was 0.09, the number continued to increase on March 31, 2017, and on April 24.95, 2017 after the instant operation, the Defendant Hospital did not examine the CP in the course of the eurine eurine test on April 4, 2017, and did not implement an inspection that is suspected of and confirmed the Plaintiff’s infection in the Plaintiff’s operation.

B. After discharge of the second hospitalization, the Plaintiff continued to feel pains on the part of the surgery and continued physical disorder. On May 1, 2017, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Plaintiff’s left-hand side at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital, and was hospitalized again. At the time of hospitalization, the Plaintiff’s left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s hospital was in a state that the Plaintiff’s left-hand side was cut down immediately due to the fluor and salting reaction, and 40 degrees high.

arrow