The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that all of the crimes of this case were led to confessions and reflects on all of the crimes of this case, but it did not pay damages until the trial of the court even though the amount of fraud was not significant in relation to the crime of fraud, there was a record of punishment several times in the past, and there was a fear that the victim had against the defendant due to notice of harm and injury to the victim who continued before the crime of this case, and there was no agreement with the victim until the trial of the case. In relation to the crime of intrusion upon residence, the fear that the victim had committed against the defendant is unfair, and there was no agreement with the victim until the trial of the case, the defendant was committed in relation to the crime of forgery of private signature, the crime of uttering of signature, the crime of uttering of the above investigation signature and signature and the crime of violation of the Resident Registration Act, and the nature of the crime was extremely poor at the time of investigation by the investigative agency, and even considering various circumstances such as the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the defendant's age after the crime, the defendant's age, character and environment, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.