logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.04.14 2015고단1524
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant pays 650,000 won to the applicant for damages.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1524"

1. On June 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was at night at around 01:01, in the office for the management of the victim E in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) opened a corrective entrance with a security card held in advance; and (c) went into inside; and (d) took away the goods equivalent to KRW 16,150,000,00 in total of the market price of the victim-owned land in the said place, at least 12,90,000,000 won; and (b) 2,50,000,000,000 won in market price, including the HP E-North Korea in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.6,15,00,00 in total, market price of the victim-owned land.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.

2. A thief: (a) around June 17, 2015, at a convenience store where a victim G in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F was on duty, the Defendant stolen the victim’s 2.1 million won in cash, and one million won in cultural gift certificates, in which the victim was on a diving spot, using the victim’s locked room.

"2015 Highest 1682"

1. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant’s fraud against the victim H sells 32 gallons prepared by the Defendant on the bulletin board “I” on the Internet site “I” at a gallon site.

“To sell smartphones to the victim H who reported and contacted the notice to the effect that it is “.”

A false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not have intention or ability to sell smartphones to the victim.

Nevertheless, on June 2, 2015, the Defendant received 470,000 won from the injured party as the sales proceeds of smartphones.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 9, 2015, the Defendant, against the victim B, sold smartphones to the victim B who reported and contacted Internet posts posted as described in the above paragraph (1) around June 9, 2015.

A false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not have intention or ability to sell smartphones to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant is on the same day from the injured party.

arrow