1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 1, 2017 to March 22, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

If Gap evidence No. 2-1 added the purport of the entire argument to the statement, the defendant is recognized as having agreed to pay the plaintiff 40 million won, 10 million won until December 31, 2013, 10,000 won, 10 million won until December 31, 2014, 10,000 won until December 31, 2015, and 10 million won until December 31, 2016, and 10 million won until December 31, 2016, and 40 million won per annum from the day after the date of payment to December 31, 2016, and 200,000 won per annum of the plaintiff's obligation to pay the plaintiff 40 million won to the day of performance. Thus, the defendant is reasonable to pay the plaintiff 20 million won per annum of the Civil Act to the day after the date of payment, and to the extent of the plaintiff's obligation to pay the plaintiff 315 days per annum of the claim.

In regard to this, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff would make up for the evidence No. 2-1 (Incompetence) by threatening and threatening the defendant, and that the defendant would pay to the plaintiff KRW 40,000,000, etc., but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable and acceptable.