logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.07.18 2017재고정1
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 26, 2004, at around 12:55, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles of the Road Management Agency by failing to comply with the request of the road management agency for loading measurement while the Defendant’s employees operated freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s duties, on the road in front of the control station of the fixed type 14th National Highway located in Gyeyang-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do. The Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles of the Road Management Agency without justifiable grounds.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment shall also impose a fine under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) with respect to the facts charged of this case where the agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 3 in relation to the business of the corporation.

A public prosecution was instituted by applying the part "," and the defendant received a summary order subject to review and the above summary order against the defendant became final and conclusive.

Accordingly, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on December 29, 201 as to the above provision of the law (Supreme Court Decision 201Hun-Ga20 Decided December 29, 201). Accordingly, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow