The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. At around 01:00 on June 4, 2018, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring the victim to D, who had consulted about the victim E in relation to the ties with the victim’s E, while the Defendant consulted about the victim’s abduction in the North-gu Seoul Northern District B published Center C, Gwangju, the Defendant told D that “I am obvious, so I am obvious, and I am the victim. I am the same.”

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when a victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint that he/she does not want punishment after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act