logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.30 2016나37890
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The key issue of this case is that the police investigators belonging to the defendant who are involved in the arrest warrant, arrest the plaintiff on the ground that the valid period has not expired, and that the presentation of arrest warrant or the proper notification of the gist of the facts under the State Compensation Act constitutes illegal acts under the State Compensation Act, and that the reasonable amount of consolation money to be recognized to the defendant in the case of constituting illegal acts under the State Compensation Act is much controversial. Accordingly, this court's reasoning is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow