The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the judgment of the court below (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, community service, 40 hours of education, 40 hours of education) is too unreasonable.

The defendant agreed to pay 5 million won to the victim, and there is a circumstance that the victim reflects the error, and the victim seems to have experience in so-called so-called "requirements Satisfaction" even before.

However, considering these circumstances, the court below has already determined the punishment against the defendant, the defendant's sexual purchase as a researcher of high academic background, which is a tort, and in particular, sexual purchase for juveniles physically and mentally well-known, is highly harmful to the juvenile, and is highly illegal, but the crime of this case is not good in that the crime of this case is committed in that it is highly high in that the defendant's intellectual disability of class 2 is giving money to the victim who lacks judgment ability, and sexual intercourse has been committed several times with the defendant, and the victim has 16 years old at the time of this case. Although the defendant's price of money paid after having first sexual relationship with the victim is weak, it seems that the defendant continued to reside in the defendant's office, and it appears that it was intended to have had sexual intercourse with the victim, and there is no other reason to believe that the defendant's punishment was unfair, considering various conditions in the sentencing of this case, such as the background and method of the crime of this case, the age after the crime of this case, and the defendant's age and character.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.