logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.09 2018가합505041
매매대금반환
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 155,169,978 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from August 31, 2012 to January 9, 2019 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 2010, C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) was awarded a contract for “construction work of the ESM F Tools” implemented by G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) around March 23, 2010. On March 23, 2010, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) subcontracted earth and reinforced concrete construction work during the said construction.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant construction site”). G purchased materials necessary for light rail-related earth and reinforced concrete construction, such as re-trial trials and sloping beam beam lines, from H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”), and brought them into the construction site of this case.

B. On November 11, 201, G prepared and issued a certificate of goods storage stating that “G shall keep the 1,150 tons sn beamline in the construction site of this case and, in the event that G fails to repay exchange funds by the due date for the redemption of bills paid to H, the ownership of the said goods shall be transferred to H,” and the certificate of goods storage was prepared and issued to H on November 1, 201.

On March 15, 2012, G sent a document verifying that “The ownership, such as the ebline, carried in to the construction site of this case, is in H, and if the construction is suspended, it shall consult with H in relation to the return, etc.,” while attaching the certificate of storage of the goods.

C. On March 15, 2012, G, including movable property transfer contracts, after the commencement of rehabilitation procedures, filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures and for preserving company property with the Seoul Central District Court (2012 Gohap32). The Seoul Central District Court, on March 16, 2012, prohibited G’s disposal of property, repayment of obligations, and provision of security without permission by the court’s ruling on preservative measures on company property, and announced the same.

§ 2.(Goods-price Claim)

arrow