logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.04.05 2017가합103710
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant attached Form to the plaintiffs

2. The amount of money in question stated in the “request amount and prize amount table” shall be the amount in question.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In order to carry out a project to remove the buildings on the land outside Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 218 lots (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”) and build a new apartment (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”), the defendant obtained authorization from the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government pursuant to Article 16 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 8785 of Dec. 21, 2007) on August 1, 2007, and completed the registration of incorporation on August 6, 2007. The plaintiffs are those who entered into a sales contract with the defendant for the general apartment units or succeed to their status from the buyer.

B. On April 23, 2014, the Defendant announced the invitation of occupants to the general apartment units among the instant apartment units on April 23, 2014, and the Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract with the Defendant from May 2014, or entered into a contract with the former buyer to succeed to the sales contract concluded with the Defendant (hereinafter “the Plaintiffs”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each sales contract in the instant case”) by referring to each sales contract entered into or succeeded to by the Plaintiffs.

3) According to the sales contract of this case, the general apartment unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit unit

The Dong and number of houses and the sale price of buildings in the attached Form

2. The description of “the claimed amount and the cited amount table” in the relevant item is the same as that of the relevant item.

2) On December 18, 2015, the Defendant obtained permission for use prior to the completion of the instant apartment, and determined “the expiration date of the occupancy designation period” as of January 15, 2016, and notified the Plaintiffs to pay all the sales price including the remainder by the expiration date. The Plaintiffs paid all the sales price including the remainder by the expiration date and moved into each of the instant sales units units. 3) The instant sales contract was each of the instant sales contracts.

arrow