logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.01.27 2020누58184
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “The plaintiff was a member of the party B in Bangladesh, and C Party Violence was a member of the party B,” and “the plaintiff was a member of the party B (B party B; hereinafter “B party”) of the party B, and the part of the judgment of first instance is identical to the part of the court of first instance, except that the plaintiff’s assertion as “the party B party B (hereinafter “B party”) in Bangladesh, which is the current party of the right of collection, is regarded as “the party C Party Violence” (the argument of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument of the court of first instance); thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow