The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant intended to purchase armoreds, and the Defendant removed the land which was put into storage at the time of the instant crime, and put the land into storage in order to prevent the occurrence of the crepancies due to the gap, and the rest was put into storage part, and there was no intention of larceny.

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the facts that the Defendant moved the wall and the mother and her mother to the seat of the kacker and loaded the wall in the clothes on the kacker, returned to the kacker and posted them to the kacker and then down to the kacker, and confirmed that only KRW 10 is confirmed to employees. If the Defendant thought that he would purchase the wall, as alleged by the Defendant, there is no reason to regard the Defendant as moving to the seat of the kacker and throw away in the kacker and placing it on the kacker.

In addition, the defense of the defendant for the reasons for inserting wall in the main machine is hard to believe by itself and there are no materials to support it.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.