logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원해남지원 2015.07.02 2014가단20438
매매대금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 32,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from May 13, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 9, 2012, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the boom boom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “boom boom boom”) concluded a contract for the joint cultivation and sale of boom boom booming with the farmers according to their respective roles by investing KRW 50 million, KRW 300 million, and KRW 200 million in the boom booming booming totaling KRW 1 billion, and entered into a contract for the cultivation and sale of booming booming produced by the farmers,

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

Then, in the course of settling profits on November 28, 2013, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the boom boom provide the Defendant with the aged 32,00,000 won equivalent to KRW 32,00,00,000. ② The Defendant sold the relevant aged boom and paid KRW 32,00,000 to the boom boom. ③ The Plaintiff issued a promissory note with the face value of KRW 38,40,000 (the amount equivalent to KRW 32,00,000) to secure this (hereinafter “instant agreement”). ④ At the time, the Plaintiff’s representative director B and the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay for the promissory note (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(A) Evidence No. 2) (c)

On November 28, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s representative director B jointly issued a promissory note of KRW 38,400,000 at par value with a recipient of booming booming booming on November 28, 2013 according to the instant agreement. The Plaintiff, B, and booming booming, a notary public, requested the issuance of a promissory note notarial deed to the effect that, if an issuer delays the payment of a promissory note under No. 486, 2013, the issuer would not raise any objection even if he/she is subject to compulsory execution (hereinafter “instant promissory

(A) No. 3. D.

In addition, on January 9, 2014, according to the instant agreement, the Plaintiff sent a horse worth KRW 32,000,000 to the Defendant.

(A) No. 4, e.

However, the Defendant did not pay 32,000,000 won as stipulated in the instant agreement, and the boom booming is compulsory execution against the Plaintiff by the notarial deed of the Promissory Notes.

arrow