logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.08.27 2020구단7132
이사비청구
Text

1. The Defendant against Plaintiff A, E, F, and G respectively KRW 751,293, Plaintiff B, C, D, and H, respectively, and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 4, 2007, the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government announced the project implementation authorization of the "I Housing Redevelopment Project" (hereinafter referred to as the "Project in this case") implemented by the Defendant in the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K Ilbu 283,260.7 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the "instant project area") as the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public notificationJ on September 4, 2007.

B. The Defendant: (a) established a management and disposition plan upon receiving an application for parcelling-out from the members; (b) established a management and disposition plan on June 26, 2008; (c) decided to revoke the above management and disposition plan on June 11, 2009 in Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2008Guhap28714; and (d) decided as is on June 29, 2010, upon obtaining authorization for the change of the project implementation of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Public Notice on November 7, 201, the Defendant revoked the application for parcelling-out at its option against the members from July 12, 201 to August 13, 2012.

C. The Plaintiffs owned residential buildings located within the instant project zone and resided therein as well as residential buildings located within the “location of the object to be expropriated” as indicated in Table 1 below. However, the Plaintiffs initially filed an application for parcelling-out and withdrawn the application for parcelling-out between July 12, 2012 and August 13, 2012, thereby becoming a cash liquidation agent on August 14, 2012.

The Plaintiffs resided in each residential building around September 4, 2007, which was the date of the public announcement of the authorization for the implementation of the instant project, and moved out of the instant project due to the implementation of the instant project at the time of the date indicated in Table 1’s “the date of report on withdrawal.” The total floor area of the portion actually occupied by the Plaintiffs in each residential building is as indicated in Table 1’s total floor area.

E. Meanwhile, the Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000 to each of the plaintiffs on the date stated in Table 1’s “the date of original payment.”

Plaintiff

On April 18, 1983, the amount of money on the date of a report on the transfer of the total floor area (the occupied area) of the house located in the object of expropriation (Seoul Seo-dong) is the date of a report on the transfer of the total floor area (the occupied area) of the house A N 73.39 square meters on April 18, 1983.

arrow