logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.03.21 2017고단4165
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2017, the Defendant, at around 20:51, obstructed the operation of the hospital by force of the victim, by misunderstanding that the Defendant refused medical treatment at the hospital due to the outstanding amounts of the Defendant at C Hospital’s office and the front corridor of the C Hospital working for the victim B in Yangsan-si, and by neglecting monitors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a business;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution (see Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., favorable circumstances for sentencing)

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria (the scope of the recommended punishment) (the scope of the recommended punishment) shall not interfere with the duties; and

2. Based on the above sentencing criteria, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of the following factors, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and motive of crime:

The favorable circumstances: The confession is deemed to be made in depth;

On January 28, 1987, the court of Ulsan District on January 28, 1987 sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years and six months, to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Ulsan District Court on April 29, 192; the court issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as an injury crime; the court issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on August 14, 2009; the summary order of KRW 70,000 as an injury crime; the summary order of KRW 70,000 as an offense of intimidation in the same court on March 18, 201; and the summary order of KRW 1 million as an assault in the same court on April 23, 2014, respectively, is reasonable.

arrow