1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 156,00 for Plaintiff A and its related KRW 5% per annum from July 1, 2014 to August 10, 2016; and (b) August 11, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a corporation established for the purposes of the development, transmission, transformation, distribution, and other related businesses of power resources. The Defendant is a corporation established for the purposes of the development, transmission, distribution, and distribution of power resources. The reported nuclear power plant’s power generation to build a large-scale transportation system and expand power facilities for the stable supply of electricity in the area between the two and South Koreas (hereinafter “instant transmission line”).

(2) The instant transmission line construction project is a construction project implementer. (2) The instant transmission line construction project is a construction project that constructs 162 power lines and processing points at a total of 90.535 km in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and Gyeongnam-si, and installs a power line at each transmission line tower. The Plaintiffs are residents living in Pyang-si, the head of the group of the instant transmission line construction project, the area outside the mountain, the area of the east-do, and the area of the west-do.

B. The Defendant transported materials, etc. using helicopter during the construction of the instant transmission line. In the case of the smuggling section in which the Plaintiffs reside, the number of working days from January 201 to June 30, 201 were 346 days, and the total number of operation hours was 9,697, and operated approximately 28 times on an average (137 times a day) as 9,697. The maximum number of daily operation hours for each of the Plaintiffs’ residential areas reaches 5-90 times. 2) The Plaintiffs did not request the Central Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee for adjudication on January 20, 2014 with respect to noise damages caused by helicopter operation, or the Central Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee dismissed the Plaintiffs’ application for adjudication on November 24, 2014 on the ground that the Plaintiffs exceeded the maximum limit of admission and the maximum number of daily operation hours for each of the Plaintiffs’ noise damages exceeded the maximum limit of admission and the maximum permissible noise level of 5-90 times.