logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고정642
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:00 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) tried to leave the road near the Namcheon-gu, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do; and (b) the victim C (the victim C) tried to leave the road after completing work at the construction site of the neighboring treatment construction site; (c) without any reason, the victim’s desire to block the vehicle and “to die.” (d) without any reason; (b) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, bread the victim’s floth, flothing the floth, cutting the floth, cutting the floth, cutting the floth, cutting the floth, cutting the floth, cutting the floth of the victim’s head over the floor; and (d) assault the victim’s head in the vicinity of his arms

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defense counsel asserts to the effect that the act as stated in the Defendant’s criminal facts constitutes justifiable act under the Criminal Act. However, in light of the developments and motive of the occurrence of this case, the Defendant’s aforementioned act, and the means and consequence of the above act, etc. admitted by each evidence of the judgment, it cannot be said that the above act of the Defendant constitutes a justifiable

Therefore, the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

arrow