1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs incurred after the appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On July 2, 2014, around 16:44, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle to turn to the left, and found an empty parking space on the left side of the moving direction after stopping at 90 degrees after driving the vehicle, and then moving the vehicle back to the front in order to park, while driving the vehicle back to the right side in the front of the parking space where the Plaintiff was parked, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle completely parked the vehicle back to the right side of the parking space where the Plaintiff was parked by driving the vehicle, and then there was an accident of collision between the Defendant’s vehicle and the right side part after driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On July 11, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 413,250 for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle as insurance money for the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul evidence 1 to 1, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the negligence that the Defendant’s driver was due to the failure of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle’s duty of safe driving in breach of the duty of safe driving, while the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the underground parking lot and parked normally. On the other hand, the Defendant asserted that the rate of negligence between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s driver’s failure to properly examine the progress of the other vehicle at the apartment parking lot is equal.

B. The judgment is based on the following circumstances, i.e., the Plaintiff’s motion picture (Evidence A7) that can be seen by the evidence of each of the above evidence.