logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.25 2018고정899
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, around January 3, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal from a person under whose name the Defendant introduced himself as a employee of Company B (C) to “to transfer KRW 100,000 to the account by opening and transferring an online telephone machine for business use for the first week of the transfer of the phone.”

On the 12th day of the same month, the Defendant opened a total of 36 Internet phone calls, such as the list of crimes, from around the same month to the 22th day of the same month, at his own store located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the Defendant opened a 070 telephone company 070 telephone HHO (E) in his own name, and delivered it to the person who is not the victim of the name.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A detailed statement of transactions of deposits and withdrawals, and written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to applications for termination of Internet telephones;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the same Act and Article 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow