A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who resides together with the victim F(19 years of age) in the D University dormitory in Jeonju-si, D University E 1124.

On November 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 18:00, the victim, who was frighted and frighted at the above site; (b) was frightened and frighted, had frighted “frighted fright, fright. f. f. d. d. d. d. d. f. d. d. d. d. d. d. f. d. d. f. d. d. d. d. f. d. d. d.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Evidence List 4);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant: (a) had less than three parts of the victim’s face in a cupped World Cup; (b) had not been injured by the victim; and (c) had been broken down and boomed on the floor after the instant World Cup; (b) there was an injury as the Defendant and the victim walked on the rear feld floor; and (c) therefore, (d)

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances admitted as evidence by this Court’s examination, the fact that the defendant prices the face of the victim in the cuppedpedped Cup and took approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, and that the defendant took an open part in the area surrounding the snow, is sufficiently recognized.

1) The victim stated in the investigative agency and this court that the defendant had consistently been faced with the head and face in the instant case, immediately after which the defendant left in the room, and that there was no way to be able to be able to see on the backline of the Defendant.

The statements of the victim are consistent, concrete and definite.