logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단4639
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is engaged in driving of Poter Cargo Vehicles B.

On October 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 07:00, and made the white-ro route in the Southern-gu white campaign at the south-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju to turn to the left at an aesthetic speed, using one lane from the south-gu to C Hospital.

At all times, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has the duty of care to check whether the motor vehicle has a motor vehicle traveling along the intersection by reducing speed and keeping the front door well, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed in contravention of the signal, even though the signal is changed to a stop signal.

The driver of the victim D (ma, 71 years old) driving along the intersection in the direction of C Hospital in the direction of C Hospital in the direction of the C Hospital was shocked by the front part of E 125cc U. S. O. and the front part of E 125cc.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the above victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties at least seven weeks of broom brooms brooms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. Each report on actual condition;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the damage was recovered due to the purchase of a comprehensive insurance for the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the background of the accident, the degree of injury, the defendant's previous conviction, etc

arrow