beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person under whose name the name was known through a public relations camera for loans from the Defendant on the first time, stating that the Defendant would lend KRW 15 million to a person under whose name the account was known of the phone bank ID and password; and (b) knew that the account in the name of the Defendant could be used for the scaming in case of informing the person under whose name the phone bank ID and password could be used for the scam; and (c) sent the number of the account in the name of the Defendant using the Kakaok to a person under whose name the phone number and password, which is the means of access to the said account, and sent the scam bank ID and password, which are the means of access to the said account, to the person under whose name the account was named.
On January 8, 2020, the name-freeist made a false statement to the victim F, who reported the site (E) at a closed-end site (E) at an irregular place, and received KRW 5,100,000 on the same day from the victim to the above Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant and received KRW 10,400,000 from the victims from January 13, 2020, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from that time, the victim acquired the total of KRW 10,40,000 from the victims to the above Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant.
In the end, the Defendant aided and aided the Defendant’s fraud by providing the account number and means of access to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.
2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act may transfer or acquire a means of access, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act;
Nevertheless, on January 1, 2020, the Defendant, using the Kakaox, informed his name-disponyer of the phone banking ID and passwords in the name of the Defendant, and sent the means of access by photographing the security cards with pictures.
Summary of Evidence
1.