A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 3, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 3, 2006, and a summary order of KRW 4,00,000,000 for the same crime from the Suwon Flag Flag on December 2, 2015.

On July 4, 2017, the Defendant driven approximately 10 meters of B K7 vehicles from the Suwon-si transferdong to the front side of the Suwon-si transfer road in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.249% among blood transfusion around 23:34.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of the driver at home and a written appraisal of alcohol during blood;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report on investigation (report on the result of confirmation of the previous conviction of the disposition, and confirmation of the date of release);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The consideration of favorable circumstances among the grounds for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - the circumstances unfavorable to the reason for sentencing (a favorable to the reason for sentencing) - The defendant has the record of having been punished several times for the same crime. The defendant’s blood alcohol content in his blood exceeds the upper limit of punishment. favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all criminal facts. The defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a fine exceeding the upper limit. - The Defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a fine until now. The period of punishment of drinking is not concentrated in two orders. The sentence is ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing revealed in the trial process in each of