Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) The Defendant did not murder the victim, and the victim is highly likely to have been fluored due to internal causes.

The following circumstances are sufficient to present a reasonable doubt that the Defendant may not murder the victim, and the facts charged in the instant case are proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt solely with the various indirect evidence or circumstances presented by the lower court.

subsection (b) of this section.

(1) The situation where the defendant was aware of his or her son at the time of rescue or relief, and the defendant deemed that he or she drinking alcohol together with the victim.

In light of the fact that there are no circumstances to see, it is impossible for the defendant to drink the victim by driving the victim's beer.

② The victim appears to have died from a long time after around March 10, 2015, when the Defendant, the victim, and the son together drinked with them, and around March 23:30, 2015. However, it is impossible for them to commit an ex post facto crime due to their lack of diving during that time.

③ Since the victim suffered from pulmonary disease, the victim could have died due to side effects due to the ethyl oxide’s uniforms, and in view of the victim’s post knium numerical value, the victim may have died due to cardio-patium alcohol or cerebrovassis.

Even if there is a serious evidence that the victim was killed, it is possible to cause the victim himself/herself, and it cannot be ruled out that there is a possibility of other causes.

In addition, it is found that a victim was found that there was a sloped up, and it is impossible for another person to stroke a stroke by strokeing the stroke, and the scoke is a phenomenon that only occurs to the living person, and the victim was croped in the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend of the bend of the scoke.