logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.07.17 2014가단12160
동산 인도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the movable property listed in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. On November 14, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the attached list (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”). According to the lease agreement, the lessee only has the right to possess and use the leased property during the lease period and the ownership of the leased property is reserved against the Plaintiff, the lessee, who is the lessee (Article 10), and if the lessee fails to pay the lease fee within the due date, the Plaintiff, the lessee, may terminate the lease agreement with a reasonable period of time (Article 20). According to the lease agreement, the Defendant delayed the payment of the lease fee, and failed to pay the lease fee to the Defendant, and thus, the Plaintiff, the lessee, who is the lessee, has the obligation to deliver the leased property to the Defendant on a total of KRW 131,738,00 as of February 18, 2014, and the Plaintiff failed to pay the lease fee to the Defendant on several occasions, including the Plaintiff’s notice of intent to terminate the lease agreement and the Plaintiff’s notice of termination of the agreement.

2. As to the Defendant’s assertion and judgment, the Defendant intended to sell the instant leased objects individually and redeem the leased fees, but the Plaintiff was placed at the time of selling the instant leased objects at the wind of the collective sale, and thereby, the damage was caused by which the said unpaid rental fees cannot be repaid.

arrow