1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. At the time of the basic fact-finding accident, the insured vehicle CD of the insured vehicle of the insured vehicle of the insured vehicle of the insured on May 13, 2018 and around 13:00 on May 13, 2018, when the insured vehicle of the insured vehicle of the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the road of this case”), where the vehicle of the Plaintiff was overtaken the vehicle beyond the center line without finding and stopping the vehicle of the Plaintiff, and the vehicle of this case was overtaken the vehicle of this case bypassing it in the future, but the vehicle of this case, which is substantially permitted to park on the right side, is trying to temporarily stop the vehicle of this case on a one-lane and two-lane way at the road where there is no signal signal, and the vehicle of this case, where the vehicle of this case, which was behind the vehicle of this case, can enter the right side of the Plaintiff, and the vehicle of this case, the vehicle of this case 200 won and the vehicle of this case, the vehicle of this case 207.7

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Gap evidence Nos. 8 through 10, the purpose of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

가. 원고 이 사건 사고는, 원고차량이 우측 마트로 진입하려고 우측 방향지시등을 켠 상태로 서행하다가 교차로 앞에서 아주 잠시 정지했을 뿐이고 곧바로 우회전을 위하여 서서히 출발하였는데, 피고차량은 원고차량이 완전히 정지하기도 전에 중앙선을 침범하여 원고차량을 추월한 후 갑자기 원고차량 앞에서 우회전을 하려는 바람에 발생한 것인바, 그렇다면 원고차량은 정상적으로 교차로 앞 정지선에서 일시 정지한 것이고, 우측 방향지시등을 켠 상태였으므로 추월의 원인을 제공한 것이 아니어서, 이...