1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. C and the Plaintiff maintained the legal marital relationship after the report of marriage on May 8, 200, and two children (the 2000sssssssssssssssssssssssss and 2003ssssssss and

In November 25, 2010, the above married couple had been married, but they maintained the living relationship and lived together with their children. On March 7, 2012, C moved to the apartment living together with the plaintiff in the original city in which the plaintiff is residing.

B. From March 2015 to December 2015, C had lived in the manner of leaving the company’s lodging house in the ceiling and leaving the company’s weekends at the weekends, and moving the Plaintiff to the original week.

C. The Defendant has maintained close relations, such as visiting C’s astronomical houses frequently and booming, punishing, and punishing, etc. the house.

C After moving accommodation to Chuncheon, the defendant and C have more frequent exchanges.

The Defendant without permission posted the documents containing the Plaintiff’s personal information, such as the Plaintiff’s children’s photographs, apartment photographs, the instant complaint, the Plaintiff’s marital relation certificate, the Plaintiff’s family relation certificate, the resident registration copy, and the certified resident registration copy and abstract, and set up a total disclosure of the documents to allow the Defendant and the Kakaoto to read such information.

E. On December 7, 2016, the Defendant filed a request for formal trial by issuing a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 on the grounds that the said act was committed against the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation), but the said summary order became final and conclusive after withdrawing the request.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 9, and 11, witness D's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff asserted the claim for damages due to an unlawful act has sustained mental pain to the Plaintiff by maintaining the Plaintiff’s illegal relationship with C, a de facto spouse.