Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the president of the "D Council member" in Thai City, and the defendant B is the relative of A and the secretary of the above hospital is the person who manages all the administrative affairs.

1. Defendant A and B, after having completed certain medical treatment, including injection at the above hospital, had a house and hospital, such as free accommodation, and could have received, or could have received, outpatients treatment, even if they could have received, proper outpatients treatment, the Defendants were in an excessive long-term hospitalization compared to the appropriate number of days of hospital treatment. However, Defendant A and B, which made it easier for the above patients to acquire insurance proceeds as if they were in possession of the insurance company and received proper hospitalization treatment.

Defendant

A, at the above hospital on July 21, 2008, at the above hospital, although E, who was found as a patient, actually received outpatient treatment, entered hospital cart and related documents to the effect that he was hospitalized in the hospital by around August 25, 2008, and subsequently, the above E was issued documents, such as a certificate of entrance and discharge, to be submitted to the insurance company to claim insurance proceeds. Defendant B had E prepare a document to the effect that he was properly provided with food, clothing, administration, physical therapy, etc. during the period of hospitalization, and then, Defendant A prepared and delivered a false certificate of hospitalization, referring to the above contents, and Defendant A received insurance proceeds. Defendant A, based on the above documents, Defendant A, on September 1, 2008, claimed insurance proceeds from F insurance companies, the victim, and received KRW 60 on September 4, 2008, 60 on the pretext of hospitalization benefits, etc., and aided the victim’s fraud.

In addition, the Defendants are 44 persons, such as E, as shown in attached Table 1.