All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original sentence against the Defendants (three years of imprisonment in case of Defendant A; one year of imprisonment in case of Defendant B; and ten million won in case of Defendant C) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of Defendant A and B are against the investigation agency to make a confession of all of the instant crimes. Defendant C also made a confession of the crime late later at the court below, and Defendant C also made an agreement with the victim Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. and LIG damage insurance Co., Ltd. at the court below. Defendant C actively made efforts to recover damage, such as deposit the total insurance money acquired for the victim's East Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., and the Defendants are the most dependent members. However, the Defendants, alone or in collusion with each other, received insurance money by means of intentionally taking traffic accident, such as unrepair cost, etc., and without paying repair cost or repair, by receiving insurance money from the insurance company, and without transferring transfer of the vehicle again without transferring the registration of transfer. Defendant A and B traded the so-called "large-type vehicle" with the victim with no intention or ability to pay siren cost even if they did not reach the period of suspension of execution, and Defendants C and C did not have to pay the amount of money for the same kind of crime, despite the fact that they did not have been aware of the amount of the above crimes.