logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고단3697
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 30, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months from the date of night building intrusion, theft, etc. in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch, and one year from the Incheon District Court's imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (ththief) on November 29, 2007, and two years and six months from the Incheon District Court's imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) on April 1, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 29, 2014 by the Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 26, 2014, at least 03:40 on September 26, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that the victim came to a restaurant operated by the victim D in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and that the victim left the restaurant after completing his/her business, and then stolen the victim’s right of 2,000 won, 6,000 won in total, which was owned by the victim who was on the front line of the main line, by cutting off the dracker’s entrance cresh and exposing into the entrance.

2. At around 03:50 on the same day, the Defendant, at G cafeteria operated by the Victim FF in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stolen cash, etc. in the store, and intruded into the correction device in the same manner, but did not discover stolen objects, but did not commit an attempted attempt.

3. At around 04:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stolen cash in the cafeteria operated by the victim H in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which appears to be a window; (b) invaded upon the correction device by the same method; and (c) committed an attempted wind without cash in the safe, despite having intruded the correction device.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each statement of H, D, and F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The police;

arrow