1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In order to serve the document of lawsuit on the legitimacy of the appeal of this case by public notice, the place where the document of lawsuit is to be served should be the case where the court is aware of the place where the document is served, but it is not simply served due to the absence of closure, service by public notice shall not be made. However, even if the service by public notice is inappropriate due to lack of requirements for service by public notice, if service by public notice is served once the presiding judge issues an order of service by public notice by public notice by public notice by public notice by public notice by public notice by the court of first instance, but the service by public notice by public notice was effective

Even if this does not constitute a cause attributable to the defendant.

(2) On October 27, 2011, the Defendant: (a) filed a move-in report on May 2, 2013 with the Health Center; (b) (c) on May 2, 2015, the Defendant filed a move-in report with “Tgu Jung-gu H”; (c) on March 16, 2015, the Defendant filed a move-in report with “Tgu Suwon-gu I building and 707” and resided in the Republic of Korea until now; (d) on January 16, 2017, the instant lawsuit filed on January 16, 201, was served with the Defendant’s father, who was the Defendant’s father, by serving a duplicate of the complaint with the Defendant’s domicile at his former domicile; and (c) thereafter, the Defendant was served with the Defendant’s domicile at his domicile at the address in favor of the Defendant and was not served with a “deficial absence” due to the delivery of the original copy by publication; and (e) the Defendant’s judgment was also served with the Defendant’s domicile.