1. The Defendant’s enforcement of the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 Ghana120856 Decided September 20, 2016 against Nonparty C.

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. Each of the instant movables was purchased from D on January 16, 2008 by the Plaintiff, and was leased to E, the mother of C, and thus, it was unlawful for the Defendant to enforce compulsory execution against each of the instant movables with the executive title against C.

B. The "Seoul Guro-gu F, 103 Dong 501", which is the location of each of the instant movables, is not the actual place of residence of C, and is only the place where C resides after C is detained, and each of the instant movables is not related to C. Therefore, in light of these circumstances, the Defendant's compulsory execution against each of the instant movables is unreasonable.

2. 청구원인에 관한 판단 갑 1, 2호증의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고가 2008. 1. 16.경 D으로부터 별지2 압류목록 기재 각 동산을 매수하여 이를 C의 장모인 E에게 임차한 사실 갑 2호증 물품임대차계약서상 그 계약일자가 2007. 1. 16.로 기재되어 있으나, 원고가 D으로부터 별지2 압류목록 기재 각 동산을 매수한 일자나 위 �품임대차계약서의 공증일자 등에 비추어 볼 때 이는 2008. 1. 16.의 오기로 보인다.

the Corporation shall be recognized.

However, in order for the plaintiff to accept the claim of this case, the identity of each of the above movables and each of the instant movables is recognized, and this is examined.

(1) In light of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 as to the movables of this case 3, 4, 7, and 8, considering the whole purport of the arguments, the movables of this case 3 are as follows: attached Table 2 attached hereto 4, 538 liters; the movables of this case 4 are as shown in attached Table 2 attached Table 11; El electronic sirens as shown in attached Table 2 attached Table 4; the instant movables of this case 7 are as Kimchip and the instant movables of this case 8 (the Form of February 2, 2002) are as identical to the air conditioners in attached Table 2 attached Table 7. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion as to each of the above movables is with merit.