1. On March 2, 2018, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff pursuant to the consignment contract between the sales store and the Defendant.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts can be recognized in the statement of sales store consignment agreement No. 1:

Around March 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff concluded an entrustment contract from around March 2017, and the Defendant asserted that the entrustment contract was concluded from around August 2016.

In relation to the Defendant, the Defendant entered into an entrustment contract with a sales store (hereinafter “instant entrustment contract”) with the content that the Plaintiff will pay fees to the Plaintiff, and that the Defendant will perform the entrusted duties by April 2, 2018. Of the consignment contract entered into around March 2, 2018 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the details of the instant case are as follows.

Article 3 (Adjustment of Sales Commissions and Payments)

4. Where, after paying the sales commission to the Plaintiff or even before paying the sales commission, a sales commission is discovered or the commission is collected from each communications company, such as C and D, in accordance with the terms and conditions of collection of the sales commission, the Plaintiff shall refund the pertinent sales commission to the Defendant, and the Defendant may pay the difference after deducting the sales commission to be paid to the Plaintiff.

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the cause of the instant claim that the Defendant unilaterally asserted that the claim for recovery set forth by the Defendant cannot be acknowledged as unjust. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant was recovered KRW 10,534,892 from the head office because it did not treat the Plaintiff’s mobile phone civil petition for the mobile phone sold. Since the voice call for three months from the Plaintiff’s attraction is less than ten minutes, the amount of commission collected from the head office was KRW 2,710,00, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,877,247 with the cost of handling the Plaintiff’s civil petition for the customer’s stored room. The Plaintiff’s mobile phone sold by the Plaintiff was terminated within 180 days and collected KRW 590,00 from the head office.