logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.09.08 2015고단604
배임등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on January 30, 2008, is the representative of C Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “C”) established for the purpose of manufacturing, selling, etc. industrial machinery, having its head office in the waters of the Haan-Gun, Haan-nam, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Hall

On November 26, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around 26, 200, with C as a debtor, obtained a loan from the Small and Medium Business Corporation; (b) the total amount of the factory machinery owned C as a collateral for such loans; (c) the amount of KRW 14,607,00 at the m/c market price;

2. The market value of Slot 49,000,000,000

3. Rodre Driwing 21,142,00 won at the market price of 1,142,00;

4.The market value of Lathea is 17,732,000 won;

5. CNC Lathe market value of KRW 118,000,000;

6. CNC Lathe market value of KRW 94,000,000;

7. CNC Lathe market value of KRW 120,000,000;

8. CNC Lathe market value of KRW 120,000,000;

9. CNC LAL market value of KRW 153,120,000 was agreed to provide the victim as collateral for transfer, and around the 30th day of the same month, 640,000,000 was loaned from the victim as collateral for transfer on or around the 30th day of the same month. On March 30, 2010, the CNC Mtilling/C market value of KRW 140,00,000 was set up a collateral security amount of KRW 936,00,000 for the previous loan and additional loan of KRW 140,000 on the 31st day of the same month to the victim as collateral.

Since then, the Defendant did not pay the principal and interest of the above loan due to the aggravation of business management, and lost the benefit of the time limit for the Defendant’s loan to the victim on July 12, 201. In order to exercise the security right to recover the loan, the victim entrusted the relevant factory, machinery, etc. with a manager and began to manage the relevant factory, machinery, etc. with the Defendant. On January 2, 2013, the Defendant had a duty to keep the above factory, which is a security for the victim, in order to achieve the purpose of the security with the care of a good manager until the time when the repayment is made.

Nevertheless, the defendant has such duties.

arrow