The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person in charge of research, who works as a professor for the electricity engineering of the F University and submitted the results of the research entrusted by an outside ordering office or support agency while working as a professor. The FF University Industry Cooperation Foundation is a juristic person entrusted with the conclusion of industry-academic cooperation agreements and the execution of research expenses, etc. with an outside ordering office or support agency, and the Korea Electrical Research Institute, the Energy Management Corporation, the two industries, and the main energy Korea are the institutions that entrusted research tasks

During the period from May 17, 2006 to September 25, 2006, the Defendant submitted an application for the payment of the cost of advisory leave utilization to the victim FK Industry Cooperation Foundation to the effect that “H and I participated in the above research task, thereby changing the payment of labor cost.” The Defendant submitted an application for the payment of the cost of using advisory leave utilization to the effect that “The payment of labor cost would change because H and I participated in the above research task.”

However, the facts were that H and I did not participate in the above research task.

As above, the Defendant submitted to the victim an application for the payment of false advisory value utilization fees, and received through the victim believed to be true, the sum of KRW 3,250,40,400 from the said Korea Electric Research Institute to the passbook in the name of H, and KRW 3,041,60,000, including KRW 3,041,60, from the passbook in the name of H to the passbook in the name of H.

In addition, the Defendant, from that time until March 9, 2012, obtained a total of KRW 47,447,040 through nine times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness J, K, L, M and N;

1. The statements of witnesses H and I in the third protocol of trial;

1. Entry of the second written protocol of examination of suspect to the defendant in part by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor in relation to theO;

1. The statement of each prosecutor's protocol against I, H, L, M, N, and K 1.