Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,591,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 12, 2012 to July 10, 2014, and the following.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On December 2, 2009, the defendant was aware of the plaintiff as a introduction to his employee of the main station who was operated by the police officer, and on May 12, 2010, the defendant was punished for rape of the defendant within the "Dju" located within the "Dju" located in the Gu Office of the Jung-gu Police Station around 12:00 on May 9, 2010.
(2) On February 17, 2012, the prosecutor of the District Public Prosecutor's Office (hereinafter "the prosecutor of the District Public Prosecutor's Office") made an investigation into the police and the prosecutor's office in the undetained state. On February 17, 2012, the prosecutor issued a disposition against the Plaintiff for the following reasons.
According to the defendant's statement, the defendant was suffering from the inner clothes called a tank tower at the time, but the above inner clothes were never teared at all.
The defendant did not at all talk about the fact that he was raped by the plaintiff to the police officer dispatched after receiving the report at the time.
The plaintiff and the defendant had a normal matrimonial relationship even before.
On June 24, 2010, as a result of the inspection of the false oral detection devices conducted by the police on June 24, 2010, the plaintiff had a false response against the defendant, and the result of the psychological analysis conducted by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office on May 11, 201, also led to the response that the plaintiff's statement is true.
Although the Defendant was raped by the Plaintiff, the Defendant was indicted for the purpose of having the Plaintiff be subject to criminal punishment (Korean Government District Court Decision 2012 Godan395), and led to the confession of the Non-Rape in the trial proceedings.
In the end, on April 5, 2012, the District Court judged that there was proof of all facts charged, including the portion without accusation on April 5, 2012, sentenced the defendant to a suspended sentence of two years in the six months of imprisonment, and the above judgment was finalized on the 12th of the same month.
[Ground of recognition] Gap 1 to 6, Gap 11 to 16, Eul 2, Eul 6 to 10 (including branch numbers, if any).