The sentence of punishment shall be suspended against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married couple, and Defendant A is the owner of the building in the area of the building in the area of Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and Defendant B is in charge of the management of the building.

On December 14, 2012, at around 12:00, the Defendants conspired with each other, on the ground that the victims E, who are operating the 'D' 'D' bank on the lease 301 of the above building, are spits spite in the elevator and are difficult to manage the building in which the cigarette butts are discarded on the elevator, and thus, the elevator is not operated. The Defendants posted a notice 'elevator' on the elevator. They prevented the operation of the elevator from operating the elevator on the second to fourth floor by force, thereby hindering the victim from performing the skin business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site inspection and complaint;

1. Defendants: Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. The type to be suspended;

(a) Defendant A: Fines of 500,000 won;

(b) Defendant B: Fines of 300,000 won

1. The defendants of suspended sentence: The sentence of sentence against the defendants shall be suspended as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendants for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act are committed in the course of committing the crime and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendants.