Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving of Bro-vehicles.

On September 12:50 on September 3, 2013, the driver driving the above vehicle and driving the front road of the department store in front of the Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, and driving at a speed above three-lanes in the direction of Geumnam-ro from the opposite intersection to the opposite intersection.

At that place, a crosswalk without signal lights was installed.

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is well in front of the front and rear seat, and when a pedestrian passes a crosswalk, he/she shall temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk so as not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the pedestrian, check the safety of the pedestrian, and proceed with the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in doing so and is proceeding.

On the right side of the road, the pedestrian was found to be late and the driver C (54 years old and female) who dried the crosswalk in the direction of the right side of the road due to the negligence of sudden suspension on the crosswalk.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to occupational negligence, which requires approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C Preparation and statement statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in the actual condition survey report and the general diagnosis report (C);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. The sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention in the workhouses is based on the consideration that the Defendant and the victim have reached an agreement smoothly after the request for formal trial of this case.