logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.01.25 2016고단1159
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults, etc. of Drivers) (hereinafter “D”), around October 13:25, 2016, had a driver F (52 years) who was an agent of the person who suffered damage to the Epic motor vehicle owned by the Defendant operate the Epic vehicle on the front of the “D,” and he was seated on the front of the Epic site. He was left on the road adjacent to the sub-project of the sub-project, which was around this time.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) intending to temporarily stop the said car on the front road of “the first apartment site Burged in Yin-jin,” which was located in 97 at the same time at the same time; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “the flag and the fule” and sent two times the victim’s back to drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) on the road in front of “the first apartment house in the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the police station,

In doing so, the h’s chest was tightly pushed up one time with both hands, and the h’s chest was assaulted, such as walking the left h’s h’s left h’s h’s h’s walk on one time with the h’s walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning field measures by police officers according to 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and H;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Basic crimes (Crimes of Interference with Execution of Official Duties) / [type of crime].

arrow