All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts, the grounds for the court’s reasoning on this part of the parties’ assertion are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 6th to 5th 6th 6th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth of the judgment of the court of first instance

2. Determination

A. 1) Whether there was a defect in the construction and management of the bicycle lane of this case, and the reasons for the court's explanation on this part are as follows: (a) the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from 5th to 6th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth son eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth g).

(1) The instant bicycle lane satisfies the standards, such as the width of bicycle lanes prescribed by the rules of bicycle use facilities.

The plaintiffs did not point out other structural problems except the boundary line.

(2) The boundary stone on the side of the instant bicycle lane is difficult to view that it was installed to separate the chemical team and the bicycle lane, and it is difficult to view that it was located in a location beyond the ordinary foreseeable range, the corner part of the boundary stone is cut, and the highest part is about 8,00 meters.