The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a taxi engineer and the victim C for business use in Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, which is located in Cheongdong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, a taxi engineer and the victim C for business use in E located in Dong-gu, Busan.

On September 4, 2016, at around 03:05, the Defendant used violence on the south-gu Busan Metropolitan City F, on the front road of G, such as spiting the victim’s face against the victim’s assault, spiting the victim’s face, and spiting the victim’s face, and spiting it into a drinking , thereby leading up to the rashed salt, uup cages and tensions, side salts and tensions.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence examined by the court below, the defendant injured the other party C.

There is no evidence that can be concluded.

(1) The other party C was assaulted by the accused as to the facts charged.

A statement is made, and spits that the Defendant first spits spits that the noise of the Defendant is confirmed as a black image of the taxi driving by the Defendant.

2. However, the Defendant consistently makes a statement from an investigative agency to the point that he/she does not assault the other party.

③ The witness H and I stated to the effect that all the Defendant was defended.

④ The Defendant’s taxi cab image was submitted, and the Defendant and C’s violent boom is not verified.

(5) If the dispute between the two parties is likely to be verified, the black image of the C Driving taxi was not submitted.

3. Therefore, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.